I have enjoyed listening to snippets of the discussion around the confirmation hearings of Sonia Sotomayor this week. One of the primary issues that has garnished a great deal of media attention has been the speculation in regards to how her personal background affects [or doesn't] her reading of the law. I find this fascinating in that it is clearly a question of hermeneutics, one that apparently affects government as much as it does the church. While obvious differences exist, they are similar struggles to interpret historical texts for current contexts. Both assume that the document is bears relevance and can speak into our context. But both often fail to keep in mind how it is that the interpreter brings context with her and thus has a lens through which the text is read. Her most famous and controversial statement was made in 2001- "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life" [source/context]. While this may or may not be true (in regards to the conclusion being "better"), Sotomayor highlights that interpretation does not occur in a vacuum: it requires wisdom, and wisdom is always acquired through experience- thus, our experience clearly shapes our wisdom. Hermeneutics is by definition a contextual art. We all have lenses, even if we fail to or are unwilling to acknowledge them.
Later, however, Sotomayor was forced to clarify/qualify that statement with the acknowledgment that while life experience shapes who one is, "ultimately and completely" a judge follows the law regardless of personal background [source/context]. Ok, sure. I can appreciate that response, because it indicates a degree of interpretive elasticity inherent in the law. But it must be noted that it is the anxiety around the loss of absolutes that drives the need for said qualifier to be offered. The same is true for the Biblical text- while meaning and truth can be found with the guidance of the Spirit in an interpretive community, the text is alive enough to speak to any context, through each of our unique lenses. This interpretation "from below" sends absolutism packing and opens theology up for contextual readings of the text.
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
obsolete works
My brother and sister-in-law are amazing artists. They believe in living simply, beautifully and differently- their art is the same. Recently they've launched a POSTnote company called Obsolete Works based on 50 images that have emerged from their doodles. As you browse the images, you almost feel the characters pull you into their world where you encounter their unique personalities. Buy their awesome art!Friday, July 10, 2009
future soundtrack
My most anticipated album of the year has offically been announced. David Bazan's full lenth "Curse Your Branches" is set to release Sept 1st but is available for pre-order on August 10th. It can't come soon enough!
Thursday, July 09, 2009
...But my grandfather's rules and beliefs did not add up as I grew older. I came to find the disjunction between the thoroughness of my mind and the limitations of church teachings intolerable. I would only be able to return to faith after I concluded that the stories and vocabulary and symbols of the faith of my childhood could withstand and contain my questions and ideas. Christianity itself would yield and expand, making room for even larger questions beyond my wildest imagining. I needed faith to be generous, open to creativity and intellect and humor...Krista Tippett- Speaking of Faith
Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Tuesday, July 07, 2009
Monday, July 06, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)